Subscribe with RSS [?]:Entries

Subscribe with Email:


Christianity has been Hijacked by Terrorists (Part 1)

30 August, 2007 by Matt Robison

The so-called New Atheism movement has a valid point and raises legitimate concern. Many atrocities have been done in the name of religion.

While I generally tune out much of what they have to say simply because their words drip with such venom, they can be commended for not being biased in their targets for damnation, which include the emperor worship of the Roman empire, the Crusades, the divine-right claims of kings throughout the middle ages, and modern day terrorist attacks.

They go too far, however, in claiming that faith itself is the underlying problem of these atrocities. Blind faith, however, is a different story and contrary to some over-generalized claims, not all faith is blind.

As evolved, intellectual ancestors of the Enlightenment positivists, it shouldn’t surprise us that Christianity is often called upon as a punching bag for the New Atheists, due to the role it has played in the shaping of western civilization itself, and how ingrained Christianity is, even in our “enlightened”, scientifically-minded culture.

Yes, many horrible actions have been justified in its name, but was it the underlying cause? Did faith in Jesus Christ, blind or otherwise, offer the catalyst for these events?

The common thread for violent atrocities throughout history, if looked at through the correct filter, is not Christian faith, but blind faith in the State.

The Construct of the State

Economically speaking and stripped down to its essence, the State is nothing but a regional monopoly on the use of force.

It derives this power from “the people”, who feel they want this monopoly over them as the most efficient and sensible way of dealing with national defense, protection of private property rights, and enacting justice. And in the areas just listed, the State is generally efficient for time.

Problems occur, however, when it attempts to extend its grasp into other areas. The State accomplishes things in other areas through the only way it can: implicit and explicit threats of violence.

You wait in the long line at the DMV because if you don’t, you’ll get a fine. And if you don’t pay that fine, something even worse can legally happen to you.

You pay your taxes because if you don’t, you can be thrown in jail and have your liberties stripped of you.

You don’t smoke pot, because in an effort to protect you from yourself, the State will strip your liberties from you. And if you grow pot, your property can be stolen from you.

In other words, you have no choice in the matter. Since it is a monopoly, there is no competition. It gets your tax money no matter what, so what does the State care what you think?

Sure, you may get some say in a “democracy”, but you only get to cast your vote every 2-4 years. Politicians, who are just as self-serving as the rest of humanity, don’t have to live with immediate consequences for their actions. A dangerous combination.

This prospect is attractive to some unethical businessmen, because they can manipulate this monopoly to get profits they normally wouldn’t get from voluntary customers. We call these subsidies, and they allow businesses to force money from “customers” at the point of gun, money that these victims would not have given up voluntarily.

And, more to the point of this article, Christians try to align with the State because it allows them to use force in order to get other people to live by a certain moral code. In other words, they get tired of trying to convince people that new creation in Jesus Christ is good news, and instead take the easier route and pull a knife on them.

What do we generally call people who threaten violence unless we give them what they want or do what they want us to do? What do we call people who like to keep others in a perpetual state of fear so they cooperate?

Depending on the context, we call them thugs and terrorists.

Continue reading Christianity has been Hijacked by Terrorists Part 2.

Share with Others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Netscape
  • Bumpzee
  • Technorati

Don't forget to subscribe to my full RSS feed to get daily updates of this blog!

5 Comments

  1. By mark smith on 09.01.2007 at 05:35 (Reply)

    People will pay a lot for eternity; that’s intuitively obvious. why else blow yourself up in a crowded market square, if not for a supposed guarantee of paradise? But atheists who want to attack ‘religion’ (read: Christianity) for it’s social dysfunction, typically kluge together religious wars from disparate regions over the past 900 years. How about something more close at hand? I give you the wars of the 20th century that all have one thing in common: an atheistic worldview on the part of the perpetrators. Exhibits A - E: WWI, WWII, Cambodia, the collectivization of the Chinese peasantry in the 1950’s (17 million dead); the depredations of Stalin & Lenin in the 1930’s - 50’s (35 million dead). Beside these, the Middle East wars, the Northern Ireland conflict, the Hindu-Islamic conflict in Pakistan & India, and the internal feuding w/in Islam are all minor skirmishes. Leo Tolstoy wrote, “Without God, all things are permissible”. Truer words were never spoken, nor borne out more clearly in history. Committed atheists need to explain where nihilism and existentialism, both of which posit an absurd meaningless universe, where morality is just another absurdity, have got it wrong.

    1. By Matt Robison on 09.01.2007 at 09:36 (Reply)

      You bring up some good points. They’re not entirely consistent, and as I pointed out, it is usually the State, or government, even “enlightened” democratic governments, that have committed the major atrocities. This includes the US, of course.

      That’s a major blow to their whole world view. If you can’t trust the state to force people to use reason without becoming tyrannical, what do you do?

  2. […] is the problem with Christian alliance with government. We bow down to the authority and power of government, just as long as we get to use some of that […]

  3. […] And to the statement that no political system is necessary, remember that a king without a kingdom is not a king at all, and a kingdom most certainly is a type of political system. Now what exactly this Kingdom entails and what it means for Christians, I hope to explore more deeply in the future, but you can read my firsts thoughts on what it probably shouldn’t mean by clicking here. […]

  4. […] would say yes. Nearly every major evil that has been committed in history has been committed by the hands of the St…, so it’s not really that big of a leap when you think about […]

Leave a comment

Subscribe without commenting